We all just wish to be completely unified, and when we awaken we simply awaken to the fact that we've always been unified. And thus we laugh because we realize we were always yearning for what we've always had right here. And the lack of thought is this place. There is existence without its reflection. There is.......

Why is it so rarely spoken of, the reality change that occurs when you have practiced stillness and non-attachment to reactiveness and impulse? Before you were a victim. Now you are the now. Who had expectations of how this now should be? Who isn't capable of distinguishing between the way morality points and the way things are in the reality being presented?

You can only imagine the absence of what exists, what is “out-there,” essentially, “nothingness.” You cannot see it with your eyes. YOU MUST ONLY IMAGINE. And what's weird is that you cannot create a new thing without first imagining it. This is the reality. And thus we see that imagining IS THE nothingness that all things “existing” flowers out of. The universe itself, all life on Earth, all artistic creations as well as those we call mere human creations, all are products of the imagination. There is an imagination that is what is behind or under all that is. And this requires not a name. In fact, to name it would be an insult if there were something to fall into the category of the insultable. God I love awakening!

People who hate believe that THEY MUST. They believe that their hatred is a requirement, because what they really desire most is acceptance.

How can this above statement be true? If our people who hate a certain group believes that what is happening is wrong, they themselves become the absolute opposite of this thing to be hated, and thus this implies, that love is the result. If you are the opposite of “hated,” you must be the “loved.” This is the idea. And yes we have a great majority who haven't the development necessary to see that it is quite a weird thing to think that the road of hatred will lead to love. Yes, it's weird. But it is the reality at present, for many. How can we hate these haters? We see their predicament. We know of their complete lack of connection with the only true knowledge there is, and this is of course the experiential sort. So, how can we have any negative feelings toward or about these people? We must love them, love each other. Not because of a “commandment,” which as a word could only be indicative of the culture in which such “commandments” were scrolled by men; these hierarchical “better-than” societies in which a daughter, like the Christian bible (God's direct word) presents with complete acceptance, can be sold into slavery. “Commandment” tells us that the bible was written by humans, because the evidence suggests that there is no outside intervention that comes to protect the innocent and righteous. There is only the divine within the human being, and his outside worship falls on deaf ears, rocks in fact, floating through-out the infinity that is space. And his inward connection with the totality without is found as himself, amongst the entirety of his experience.

So if people who hate are really trying to position themselves in their own minds as the opposite of hate by hating “something else that is hateable” and thus NOT the individual self that is doing the “hating,” then we see clearly and unobstructed that the wordy morality the superficial society has been aloud to embed in us, which is what creates the idea of division in the first place, is the exact thing we all wish to be rid of in the first place. We wish to be rid of separation, and we try and become unified by hating, the very thing that separates. That is a weird human predicament. And one worth inward study.

Our friend, censorship. It must be our friend, for it accompanies us wherever we go. Governmental organizations are set up to keep certain words and images from being broadcast on TV and the radio. Weird.

It all goes along with the idea of offense. We all wish not to be offended. We wish not for that which is offensive to sweep into our lives. Yet rarely do we ever realize offense as a choice.

We rarely look at the facts: there are vibrations hitting my ear drums and electrically being translated into my perceptive awareness as meanings that provide me with stress. Yet this sound never causes stress for ears belonging to heads and bodies that do not speak the language these sounds are coming from. An Italian guy doesn't care if he sees the word “fuck” in Taiwanese on television. He has no clue what the generally accepted meaning of the sound is. For all he knows, the word spoken meant “wild flower.”

So, if there is a relativity in the sounds that we hear, and we are the choosers of its meaning, shouldn't we also be able to take in any outward vibration and let it be without giving it the generally accepted meaning? Shouldn't we fess-up and say to ourselves in the most honest voice: “I am fully responsible for all offenses I experience.”

Right and wrong, as a thing to be taught, is the same as any mental idea. It's unnecessary. There would be no crime if there were no oppression and money. There would be no violence, if there were to be no bondage, debt, and ideas of a ruling God.

Just some sharings.

Peace